alpinlol said:
i usually dont suggest xeons on a forum to not get shittalked ... if you would have msged me via pm id suggested you an xeon if you try to save money but want performance like an actual i7 since its the same cpu architecture.
Yeah it's actually pretty funny that every i3, i5, i7 and Xeon CPUs (
within same generation and socket) are physically 100% the same CPU. This way they save money because they can use same production lines. All the differences between models are made by a firmware (which cannot be accessed by the user) or physically or if there was a chip with:
a) faulty core it can be used as 2 core i3/i5
b) faulty iGPU it can be used as iGPUless Xeon
they can also disable some shaders from the iGPU to get the difference between HD 2500 and HD 4000
For example E3-1230V2/V3 really has a iGPU but it's disabled. i3 really has 4 cores and 8 threads but 2 of the cores are disabled which leaves 2 cores and 4 threads.
Same applies to AMD FX CPUs. Everyone of them has 8 cores but they disable 2 of them to get for example FX-6300.
Even some AMD Phenom II x4 processors can be unlocked to a Phenom II x6 processor which confirms they are physically the same CPU. Those processors that can be unlocked has a firmware bug that allows it.
you actually dont have to care about oc'ing they will do just fine you wont run in any real problem in case of performance.
I agree with that. If i was going to build a dedicated stream pc, i'd choose a Xeon E3-1245V3 since it has enough power for streaming at stock speeds.
Edit: Here is the die of the E3-1230V2. You can clearly see that it has the iGPU but it's just disabled by firmware. This is basically the die of the every socket 1155 Ivy bridge CPU