Question / Help What Am I Doing Wrong?

X

xIndica_xHigh

New Member
So im trying to achieve a stable 720p60 Destiny 2 Gameplay. Which all my Settings are on low as well. So it doesnt Tax my CPU & GPU has hard becuase im that dude that cares more for FPS than Quality! Console Player for so long cant stand 30 FPS anymore. My streams cant keep that stable 60 FPS at 3500-4000 Bitrate. My speeds are 500 Download with 15 Upload

PC Specs:

GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
i7-7700HQ 4 Cores @ 8 Logical Cores
16GB RAM
 

Attachments

  • 2019-12-15 11-15-45.txt
    14.9 KB · Views: 15
  • 2019-12-15 15-46-32.txt
    17.5 KB · Views: 7
  • 2019-12-15 09-22-13.txt
    16 KB · Views: 5
  • 2019-12-15 09-54-13.txt
    16.1 KB · Views: 5
X

xIndica_xHigh

New Member
Narcogen said:
15:58:28.318: Video stopped, number of skipped frames due to encoding lag: 1739/32296 (5.4%)

You're overloading your encoder. Change to a faster preset. Veryfast is recommended for most. Or use NVENC instead of x264, your GPU supports it.

09:40:40.233: YUV mode: 709/Full

You're increasing load and decreasing quality. Change to 709/Partial.

https://obsproject.com/forum/resour...t-color-range-settings-guide-test-charts.442/
Click to expand...


So you mean SuperFast i tried VeryFast an it still got encoding lag. So imma do 609/Partial with SuperFast Preset if that would make my stream more stable at 60 FPS. or would 609/Full be better.

Ive changed it to this. 720p60, Superfast, 4000 Bitrate Lanczos, 609/Partial, Above Normal Process Priority in Advanced, Profile = Main. Ive had alot of folks say my processor will definaity be able to handle 720p60 just not 1080p60. Planning on Buying a Gaming Laptop with the i7-9750H or the I7-9850H Processor.
 
Last edited:
Narcogen

Narcogen

Active Member
Full is not better. More encoding load, and will look worse on the displays most people watch on. People get fooled by the name, thinking "Full" must be better than "Partial". There's a grain of truth in that, but the fact is that most of the devices people watch on don't support that color space, and when content gets converted from Full to Partial, it looks worse.

Meaning you make your encoder work harder for an end result that is worse than if you hadn't.
 
X

xIndica_xHigh

New Member
Narcogen said:
Full is not better. More encoding load, and will look worse on the displays most people watch on. People get fooled by the name, thinking "Full" must be better than "Partial". There's a grain of truth in that, but the fact is that most of the devices people watch on don't support that color space, and when content gets converted from Full to Partial, it looks worse.

Meaning you make your encoder work harder for an end result that is worse than if you hadn't.
Click to expand...

Alright i put my preset as Superfast an i think i hit the sweet spot.
 
koala

koala

Active Member
Superfast is also superugly, if you use it for streaming. Use nvenc, on your GTX 1050 it produces about the same quality as the veryfast x264 preset. This is definitely better quality than superfast. So if you cannot use an x264 preset better than veryfast (such as faster or fast or medium) for CPU usage, it's better to use nvenc, which uses no CPU at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top