sin espacio en el disco
- Thread starter rml
- Start date
PaiSand
Active Member
Youtube puede guardar los streams que hagas.
Las grabaciones que hagas en tu computadora las puedes subir a youtube, pero youtube las va a volver a codificar, donde podrías perder calidad. No existe otra forma de guardar de forma automática en youtube.
El espacio necesario varía dependiendo la resolución y calidad con la que quieras grabar. Cuanto mayor sea el espacio, mejor.
Así mismo, cuanta mayor la calidad y resolución que uses, mayor velocidad de grabado se necesita y un disco rígido no te servirá. Para esto necesitas un disco de estado sólido m.2 con la mayor velocidad de escritura que se pueda, que lo determina no solo el disco sólido, si no la placa madre y CPU que tengas.
Por ahora solo se puede especular ya que no has pasado datos que son muy necesarios y que se ven en el archivo de registro del momento en que grabas, una vez que ya has terminado de grabar.
Las grabaciones que hagas en tu computadora las puedes subir a youtube, pero youtube las va a volver a codificar, donde podrías perder calidad. No existe otra forma de guardar de forma automática en youtube.
El espacio necesario varía dependiendo la resolución y calidad con la que quieras grabar. Cuanto mayor sea el espacio, mejor.
Así mismo, cuanta mayor la calidad y resolución que uses, mayor velocidad de grabado se necesita y un disco rígido no te servirá. Para esto necesitas un disco de estado sólido m.2 con la mayor velocidad de escritura que se pueda, que lo determina no solo el disco sólido, si no la placa madre y CPU que tengas.
Por ahora solo se puede especular ya que no has pasado datos que son muy necesarios y que se ven en el archivo de registro del momento en que grabas, una vez que ya has terminado de grabar.
For "spinning rust" vs. "fancy sand" (mechanical hard drive vs. solid state), the big difference is usually in the read speed, but not so much the write speed.
For a mechanical drive, read and write are close to the same, because the same constraints dominate both: it has to physically move the head to the right radius, and then wait for the platter to come around to the right angle. Only then can it read or write to a given spot. But if it can read or write sequentially, not jumping all over the place, it can still saturate a modern SATA connection either direction.
For a solid state drive, it can read anything almost instantly, because it's all electronic with nothing moving. It requires an even *faster* connection to keep up with that, which I believe M.2 is. But writing requires it to explicitly erase what used to be there and then write new, and both are relatively slow. So it's closer to a mechanical drive in that sense. The TRIM command is essentially a bulk erase of everything marked as free, so that can speed up writing later, but it only does half the job. The write itself is relatively slow too.
(TRIMming an SSD effectively replaces defragging a HDD, as the required periodic maintenance. Windows' defragger does both, and picks the right one automatically.)
---
That's not to say that you should still use a mechanical drive to record on. I do, and it's fine, but modern solid state is still faster at the connector than mechanical is at the connector. Like usual for computers, there are tricks to make that work, like caching a bunch of writes to do all at once instead of one at a time. Each cell still takes a while, but multiply that rate by the size of the cache, and now it can easily keep up.
But if you kill or lose power at the wrong moment, then what you thought was saved - and you *did* in fact click the button - isn't. Only after a complete shutdown, or explicit ejection of removable media, are things the way you think they are.
For a mechanical drive, read and write are close to the same, because the same constraints dominate both: it has to physically move the head to the right radius, and then wait for the platter to come around to the right angle. Only then can it read or write to a given spot. But if it can read or write sequentially, not jumping all over the place, it can still saturate a modern SATA connection either direction.
For a solid state drive, it can read anything almost instantly, because it's all electronic with nothing moving. It requires an even *faster* connection to keep up with that, which I believe M.2 is. But writing requires it to explicitly erase what used to be there and then write new, and both are relatively slow. So it's closer to a mechanical drive in that sense. The TRIM command is essentially a bulk erase of everything marked as free, so that can speed up writing later, but it only does half the job. The write itself is relatively slow too.
(TRIMming an SSD effectively replaces defragging a HDD, as the required periodic maintenance. Windows' defragger does both, and picks the right one automatically.)
---
That's not to say that you should still use a mechanical drive to record on. I do, and it's fine, but modern solid state is still faster at the connector than mechanical is at the connector. Like usual for computers, there are tricks to make that work, like caching a bunch of writes to do all at once instead of one at a time. Each cell still takes a while, but multiply that rate by the size of the cache, and now it can easily keep up.
But if you kill or lose power at the wrong moment, then what you thought was saved - and you *did* in fact click the button - isn't. Only after a complete shutdown, or explicit ejection of removable media, are things the way you think they are.
Also, solid state memory wears out after a while. It takes a long while, but it eventually does. To greatly extend its life, they have a "wear leveler" that constantly rearranges the connections between physical and logical addresses. So if you save a file 20 times, you actually have 20 different versions of that file scattered throughout the physical memory, and only the latest one is shown to the rest of the computer. The rest are marked as free space.
The more free space the wear leveler has to do its job, the longer the drive will last, because each individual cell is used less. This goes for SSD's, USB drives, SD cards, etc., etc...
So get something big, and barely use it. Do use it, of course, but keep a ton of free space, and you'll probably never see it fail.
The more free space the wear leveler has to do its job, the longer the drive will last, because each individual cell is used less. This goes for SSD's, USB drives, SD cards, etc., etc...
So get something big, and barely use it. Do use it, of course, but keep a ton of free space, and you'll probably never see it fail.