Nass86
Member
Hello guys,
I had a little laugh at myself today. I test-cranked the settings way up on CQP 18 for a 1080p recording at 60fps on my Nvenc encoder.
It looked quite good but not worth the (wait for it) 64gb I racked up in 2 hours.
Furthermore, I uploaded it to youtube, realised I wanted to edit some bits out, and figured it would be faster to download the compressed version and upload that again after I'm finished editing. The upload took about 24 hours!
Guess how big their version of my file was? (again, wait for it..) a mere 1.6gb. One point six!!
I had heard an experienced Youtuber say today there's no point in going below 22 CQP if the file will only end up on youtube as he had tested lower numbers down to 15 and the visual quality stayed the same once he went under 22 and youtube did it's own compression on all tested videos.
So it begs the question - if I'm recording on Nvenc with CQP, what should the setting really be to try and look as good as possible and almost match the quality youtube shapes my recording into anyway? Or is CQP 22 the jackpot?
I was recording at CQP 18, Max Performance mode (as "Max Quality" doesn't make a difference in CQP output quality but also risks encoding lag / uses more GPU).
So I'm happy staying at 22, but is there something else I'm able to do to basically give youtube what it'll spit out anyway?
I had a little laugh at myself today. I test-cranked the settings way up on CQP 18 for a 1080p recording at 60fps on my Nvenc encoder.
It looked quite good but not worth the (wait for it) 64gb I racked up in 2 hours.
Furthermore, I uploaded it to youtube, realised I wanted to edit some bits out, and figured it would be faster to download the compressed version and upload that again after I'm finished editing. The upload took about 24 hours!
Guess how big their version of my file was? (again, wait for it..) a mere 1.6gb. One point six!!
I had heard an experienced Youtuber say today there's no point in going below 22 CQP if the file will only end up on youtube as he had tested lower numbers down to 15 and the visual quality stayed the same once he went under 22 and youtube did it's own compression on all tested videos.
So it begs the question - if I'm recording on Nvenc with CQP, what should the setting really be to try and look as good as possible and almost match the quality youtube shapes my recording into anyway? Or is CQP 22 the jackpot?
I was recording at CQP 18, Max Performance mode (as "Max Quality" doesn't make a difference in CQP output quality but also risks encoding lag / uses more GPU).
So I'm happy staying at 22, but is there something else I'm able to do to basically give youtube what it'll spit out anyway?